Sunday, September 24, 2006

asymmetrical

Stuck in the mud? Pull yourself up by your own boot straps. Your own power should be able to do it. Being asymmetrical to the pull down of gravity. If you push and pull something at the same time with equal force the object doesn't move. But what if you staggered the push pull so that they didn't occur at the same time, with one force being stronger than the other end. It means you would move forward.

Many devices speak of this asymetrical difference including Tom Bearden and his reference to Lorentz straightening out the asymmetrical mathematical formulae of Maxwell which is taught to students today. Bearden claims that it is the asymmetrical aspect of the equations that allows for free energy. And they've been written out of Maxwell.

So perhaps it is the lopsidedness of something that is the key to tapping the aether. Some aspect that pokes out of the smooth field.

We received word from Veljco Milkovic to check out his site, www.veljkomilkovic.com . One item of interest, the lament that digital was taking over mechanical and we are losing our expertise in mechanical. Obviously not good in that if something mechanical works on the drawing board and computer doesn't mean things actually work until you do 'em.

Veljco has sent a copy of his book dealing with the throw away asymmetrical force that he believes can be harnessed and scaled up. We have asked him to comment on Unity which is focus, like a microscope.

Nothing new from Frolov or Puthoff except Dr Hal has moved to larger more wonderful premises and Big Al has remarried. All the best.

This inertial asymmetrical force includes the work of Sandy Kidd, a guy who with some kind of plunger action was able to thump his way around in a boat with no motor or paddle, just a device that smacked the inside front of the boat and moved it forward. A similar experiment was on wheels.

Naturally, I side with Unity as the most unique and conceivable way of achieving free energy and gravity control. But this inertial business is telling us that if we're sitting in a perfectly balanced seat on wheels and lean to the left and tap, the energy will shift the inertia left and if we're on wheels we'll move left. Is it gravity? Or is it that tiny bit of inertia generated by the tapping of your finger. Veljco suggests more.

I don't know, Marty, what do you think?
I think my name is Vince. Who're you?
Just a guy who wonders about stuff.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

antigravity

But not control.

Many scientists today are pursuing the Thomas Townsend Brown method of antigravity by zapping things with electricity. This is all very fine and like the amazing levitating ring it shows a kind of coupling with the object in question, which rises when it's plugged in and falls or stops when you cut the power.

Levitating rings and lifters are amazing! They appear to be true antigravity.

But they are not gravity control.

Control of gravity means not harnessing the mythical gravity beast itself, it doesn't exist.

To control gravity in the sense of electromagnetism, not rockets, means to understand and control the underlying force that actually controls gravity.

Thursday, September 07, 2006

not gravity control

President George W. Bush has not yet finished his speech and I am moved to comment.

Oil has the best chiefs executives and army but, to realize there's a new guy in town, meaning, the underlying force. The force that was proved to not exist by the 1889 Morley Michelson experiment - the aether just ain't there. Wrong!

What the hell do you gas providers think it might be that powers the universe. If you were smart you'd make the jump and somehow attach a charge to free energy before it's free. A horrible thought. Yet, what can we do to get the job done? We think it's universities with teachers and students interested in
www.gravitycontrol.org/projectunity

If governments have it and are not forthcoming, it's up to us. We are free and enterprise.

If there really is an mib (altho based on a comic) and a whole lot of other secret folk supposedly keeping a lid on it and sworn to some weird secretive masonic oath, or whatever, it's up to us.

To the opposition if there is one, keeping the savior of the technological world a secret at this time of need might be considered a sin.

It looks like the part of the world which is against the exaltation of this work, if they have it, wants to make sure it's good to the last drop before introducing a new system.

And of course, maybe nobody has nothing (g) and we are in for a terrible and perilous decline with no hope save the quest for gravity control.

I can say this. Although Project Unity is difficult and strange to even scientists, I believe it works. It's like flubber, the new flight.

The four phase field modulator is ready to go. And boy do we need help to make it so.
Antigravity

Sunday, September 03, 2006

conversation from the aether IIl

I read your Tom Bearden stuff and I too wondered, why don't they have the meg by now, seems a long time.

But further to that he revealed that in 1892 Lorentz evened out the math and algebra so so that it would be symmetrical instead of asymmetrical and Bearden's point was, the smoothing of the equations which are taught as Maxwell today are not Maxwell. They are equations converted to a symmetrical definition and it's the asymmetrical equations that allow for 'free energy'.

Friday, September 01, 2006

before Roswell



Before the second world war there was Viktor Schauberger who apparently had flying discs in the 30's and/or 40's.

But before Roswell and Schauberger there were visual descriptions like this aboriginal rock painting that might be 40,000 years old.

Question. Since they have had Schauberger's technology since 1945, why are they spending all this money on rockets? And prey tell, why is the combustion engine still the main squeeze?

I used to believe that Schauberger's propulsion was not related to antigravity. But the part that apparently Schauberger didn't understand is that once his torsion field, an implosion effect, not explosion, got up to speed and began to run itself, where was the energy coming from that fed his tornado? Conjecture was, from another dimension. It sure ain't coming from here. Enter, the underlying force.

eXTReMe Tracker