Friday, December 30, 2005

Hellyer - I believe, ufo update

This may not be gravity control per se but it's good theatre.

Actually, more than good theatre the above is quite up to date as of this writing and represents a cross-section of the latest events. Paul Hellyer has yet to get back to us at gravity control. He's busy out there pitching and circuiting the media. No one has asked him, have you ever met an alien? Wilburt Smith, the head of Project Magnet in the fifties talked of aliens as if they were drinking buddies. He got shut down. In the links above you'll find that the media in America regards Mr Hellyer as having just returned from Kookland. Perhaps he should go to Brazil where the air force has just admitted ufo's and wants to know more.

If there is a 58 year old secret about the first in modern times landing and crashing of an alien craft then that secret is on a par with the Manhattan project and area 51. Although ufo's are a modern myth that still needs proving, the ridiculing of the subject in America has divided the nation as if it were an unpopular war. The disbelievers, and believe me it's easier to be a disbeliever, and the believers. The believers are weird. They think it's a space religion. But to bring this to a point, there are the believers of gravity control and its success. If the aliens are there, we could skip all this moonstation galactic war crap, they could give us the secret of their propulsion system and we would be so grateful, especially that they didn't just cinder us, that peace would be forced to reign over our small planet. Come on, Guys.

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

We must POP this to get on the list

Not making the Tim Ventura Who's Who in Antigravity list is only disappointing in one way.

Most of the list was zap and spin. There was no mention of focus, the way of harmonizing with the universe.

Those mentioned who mostly weren't zap and spin were Tesla, Frolov, Kozyrev and....I don't think they mentioned John Keely (checked, nope).

And the one disappointment was, W. David Barclay failed to be mentioned. The guy with the focus.


Wednesday, December 21, 2005

do aliens celebrate Christmas

Apparently it is now politically correct to refer to Christmas and New Year as The Holiday Season. To not offend who? Whom? Christians must be a tad miffed.

Wishing You All good thoughts and good wishes come true

Friday, December 16, 2005

these blogs

These blogs are the theory and thoughts of David Barclay.
We get no comments, we feel, because our blogs may be too long and or too complicated.
Some might say, incomprehensible.
Yet we believe people are dropping by and checking out the new theory guy, David. His blog.
Second blog on the left.

I can only describe W. David Barclay's theory in simple terms.
It involves creating a field within a field. In other words, the craft you are in is a field unto itself able to interact with the earth which is the outside field and everything beyond.
There is no zap and spin, merely a focus. There is no fuel nor exhaust because the system takes power direct from the aether, the underlying field of all.

That's David's theory in a nutmeg, hey, it's the holiday season. But, if that excites you as it does us, read on. And please leave your questions and comments, with David, not me.

My blogs? Well, it all began with a little five thousand watt radio station....actually it was only a thousand watts, CJRl, Kenora, Ontario, Canada, hi to Dennis and Mr King....but I digress. My blogs are my thoughts and much conjecture and theory, clues, facts, sometimes wanton sometimes won ton, when I get hungry. But always with the compelling notion that it's just around the corner. The Fuel-less Drive. To take the place of the explosive engine. The harmonizing with the vibrations all around us and being able to whisk around the universe like firefiies although quicker.

Mine is a background of fascination of that which seems at least semi real. As a kid I read so much about flying saucers that eventually I got tired of it all and the only thing I wanted to know was how they traveled. And instead of continuing to search for more lights in the sky, contactees, abductees and fuzzy photos, I began The Quest For Gravity Control, not the movie in search of a beginning, just, the quest. By about 1968 I was pretty sure that someone would come up with gravity control because pollution was a word that began to be bandied about.

In a sense, my blogs reflect the way I've searched more recently and newer conclusions on the subject but the kid is always in me that we can save the world and get the gc show on the road. And I know I'm not alone.

Ah, but we've once again tarried and become guilty of running a bit long. We believe the essence of gravity control is contained in Project Unity. Whether you're a casual reader, a likeminded scientist or a protaganist,
we invite you to 70 pages of Project Unity.
Please use anything you want, no charge.
But please keep in touch with your experiments.

And please read my blogs too. For those listed under the Ya Wanna Know factor. Unlike David's theory, my blogs, which follow from a downward but ever uprising scroll, are incomplete. Searching, searching, this blog may be under construction for a while but even in its temporary state might appeal to others of a similar compulsion.

Actually, if you really want to know, prepare yourself and read David's blogs.

Monday, December 12, 2005

a thought from a guy who knew something


Wilbert Smith

Once upon a time there was a man who stood in court accused of stealing chickens. The farmer, his son and the hired man all testified that they had seen the man steal the chickens. After hearing the evidence the judge said, “Defendant, what have you to say for yourself?” The man just smiled and said, “Sir, I can produce twice as many witnesses who will testify that they did not see me steal the chickens.”

Unfortunately, this is typical of much of the thinking with respect to flying saucers. Healthy scepticism is good, but this kind of scepticism is ridiculous. Non-awareness is NOT synonymous with non-existence, and disbelief in something does not in any way detract from its reality. No one can create a fact by making a statement, and no one can get rid of a fact by denying it.

Statistically many more people have seen flying saucers than have seen atomic bombs, but the bomb information comes gilded with authority while the flying saucer information comes draped in scepticism. We do not ordinarily think to question on the basic facts upon which the information is based, but form our opinions more on the way in which the information comes to us. We live our daily lives so very much under the shadow of Authority that we instinctively attribute to Authority an omniscience, which it really does not possess, and take the easier way of succumbing to its dictates than thinking for ourselves. A fact is nonetheless a fact though having been stated by a seedy waterfront character or suave diplomat or international reputation. It is we, and we alone, who must decide for ourselves what is or is not a fact; and we are responsible to ourselves for that decision.

“Prove all things; hold fast to that which is good.” No one can prove without investigation. And investigation takes time and effort; often more than we are prepared to put forth.
If we are not prepared to make the necessary effort to carry out an adequate investigation, are we really entitled to have our opinions taken seriously?

In the absence of personal investigation, it is tempting and easy to accept Authority for Proof, but we are really fooling ourselves when we do this, since we can never really KNOW.
Better that we should keep an open mind, and seize on the individual facts as they come drifting by, until we have enough to justify an opinion which is really our own.

Wilbert B. Smith
Master of Science
U of BC

Friday, December 02, 2005

ufo's are real says canuck politico

In early September of [[2005]], Hellyer made headlines by publicly announcing that he believed in [[Unidentified flying object|UFOs]].

That's the Honourable Paul Hellyer, former defence minister of Pearson's Canadian government, circa '63-67.

His mission is to keep weapons out of space.

Well, since that day in September Mr Hellyer hasn't generated much in print but he did appear on the Tucker Carlson show on December 12th

CARLSON: Welcome back. According to my next guest, the truth is out there. Actually up there, with our neighbor to the north, Canada.

A former Canadian government official is warning we may be on the verge of intergalactic war, saying, quote, “The Bush administration has finally agreed to let the military build a forward base on the moon, which will put them in a better position to keep track of the comings and goings of visitors from space and to shoot at them if they so decide,” end quote.

Paul Hellyer is a former minister of defense and deputy prime minister of the country of Canada. He joins us now from Toronto. Mr. Hellyer, thanks a lot for coming on.


CANADA: Not at all, it‘s a pleasure.

CARLSON: Now, you were the minister of defense of Canada. When you autopsied that position, I believe, under Prime Minister Lester Pearson, did you come across any classified information that suggested UFO‘s were real?

HELLYER: No, not really. We got regular reports that showed that some of them were, in fact, unidentified. Some of the sightings could not be explained as natural phenomenon, but nothing more than that.

CARLSON: Well, as you know, there‘s been this debate for years over whether or not they are real. Most people don‘t think they are real, or most people at least are hesitant to say they believe they are real in public. What convinced you they do, in fact, exist?

HELLYER: Well, for the last two or three years, I have been looking at the evidence, and assessing it, much as I guess a judge would. And trying to determine who was telling the truth and who wasn‘t. And I finally concluded, especially after reading a book called “The Day After Roswell,” written by Colonel Philip Corso, that unidentified flying objects are, in fact real. As real as the airplanes flying over your head, and that there has been a monumental cover-up for more than half a century.

This is after, you know, looking at a lot of evidence and trying to discern who was telling the truth and who wasn‘t. And I have concluded unequivocally that the people, who claim that they have either seen UFO‘s or have seen classified documents about UFO‘s or have seen wreckage from the crash at Roswell, on or about July 4, 1947, are the ones telling the truth. And consequently, I am basing my policy considerations on that.

CARLSON: Where did you come across this information that the Bush administration is building a forward base on the moon, and why would they do that? And why would they keep it from the public?

HELLYER: Well, to answer your second question first, I don‘t know.

That is the reason I am raising the question, is to see why they are.

CARLSON: Well how do you—how do you—that‘s an awfully specific claim. I haven‘t read it in the “New York Times.” Doesn‘t mean it‘s not true, doesn‘t mean you‘re wrong, but I am interested to know why you think that.

HELLYER: Well, because this was forecasted in Colonel Corso‘s book. They were wanting to build a base on the moon, as far back as 1964. And General Arthur Trudeau (ph) -- same name as one of my bosses—was very determined to build a forward base on the moon. And prepared all of the specifications necessary for it, and the blueprints, and so on.

CARLSON: Well, is it—pardon me. I don‘t mean to interrupt you, but doesn‘t this make sense? I mean, if, in fact, there are extraterrestrials and they are buzzing our planet, why wouldn‘t we want to take steps to defend ourselves from them should they turn hostile?

HELLYER: Well, I think the critical question is whether or not they are hostile. You see, when they were first—when the crash first occurred, General Nathan Twining (ph) later became the...

CARLSON: In Roswell?

HELLYER: Yes, after that crash occurred, he declared that they were enemy aliens. Now, there‘s no evidence, that I have seen, that would really convince me that they are, in fact, you know enemy.

And what I would like to know is whether that classification of enemy aliens still exists or whether it doesn‘t, and if it exists, what the evidence is on which the United States government bases its conclusions. I think that‘s tremendously important.

CARLSON: I think that‘s an entirely fair question. Now, finally, you laid out these views in September of this year at a speech at the University of Toronto, and according to the news report I have of the speech, your address, quote, “ended with a standing ovation.”

And that implies, I think, that your views are commonplace in Canada. They are a minority view here, distinct minority view. Do you think most Canadians believe that there is a forward base under construction on the Moon and that aliens are buzzing the earth?

HELLYER: No, absolutely not. Most of them are skeptics. Most of them haven‘t spent much time researching the subject, and so they‘re, I think, the average here would be very similar to the average American. And I am hoping that, maybe, we can persuade the Canadian Senate to hold hearings and listen to some of the 400 witnesses that your Dr. Steven—what‘s his name? Oh, Greer, Dr. Steven Greer, has compiled, and hear them, and, you know, make up their minds as to whether or not there is a real threat.

CARLSON: All right.

HELLYER: And, maybe, this would be just enough to push the American government, the U.S. Congress or Senate, into holding its own hearings, and then getting the United States government finally to come clean and tell us what they are worried about.

CARLSON: OK. Canada‘s former minister of defense, Paul Hellyer. If you are right, history will record you as a visionary. If you are wrong, well, I‘m glad you came on anyway. Thank you.

HELLYER: It‘s a pleasure.


It appears Mr Hellyer seems somewhat less than totally informed and could use our help. We sent him a letter offering our support and help if he wants it.

eXTReMe Tracker