Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Wil Smith

This is old but it's not if it's new to you.


We like Wilbert Brockhouse Smith. His book called The New Science is posted here


At 6:03 a.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

This postis not a concept, rather a comment on the so called Field Frequency Modulator =proposed so highly on the gravity control site;

This idea suggests that a device could be built that would generate a electromagnet field in some phased relationship with the Earth's EM and use the differential between this field and the Earth's own magnetic field as a means of gravity control and propulsion.

1. The earth's EM field is so weak that the generation of the secondary field would need to be huge in order to reach a significant differential.

2. This idea, even if it worked, is not gravity control, anymore that a chemical rocket or a ping pong ball floating on a column of air is gravity control. It would just be another means of providing a sufficient force capable of moving an object up more that gravity is pulling it down.

The FFM idea seems ok to the novice, but if you guys are serious, you should look past big words and diagrams when you seek an answer.

I do not know how to control gravity, I wish I did. I think that the answer must lie in the nature of gravity itself, which we don't know; is is possibly like light, and probably has the same wave-partical duality that is shown with the slit experiment using photons. It also obeys the speed of light limit as shown by Eistein in the absent star though experiment.

just a comment. good luck.

At 10:51 p.m., Blogger gravity control said...

Do you hear your words?
This can't possibly work.

When science in the past clung to old beliefs....

Gravity control obviously works.

I invite you to read gravitycontrolidealism blogs.

Science is challenged and your precepts are noble. But what if they were wrong?

Hey, not everything. Just certain stuff. You might entertain in small bits that science in this case might have cause for leeway.

We understand that not everybody gets it.

We hope that somebody will look at Project Unity and say, I can build that.

Book now for the home model.

At 8:19 a.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the canned response.

Note that what I said is, FFM is not gravity control, but
just another method for overcoming it's effects through some other force, in this case a delta between one EM Field and the Earth's own.

Gravity Control implies just that, control of the force of gravity. Control in the same form as we now control an EM Field through the manipulation of electron flow through a conductor.

It will (probably) be realized through a deeper understanding of how gravity actually works.

For example, we manipulate an EM Field by manipulating the amount of electrons flowing through a conductor using doped material that 'resists' the flow of electrons, or conducts them.

A bona-fide gravity control project would likely be based on the as-yet-undiscovered control of mass; which gravity seems to depend on.

At any rate, I was hoping for an educated, thought-provoking, human response, rather than a knee-jerk reaction to a comment that didn't immediately agree with your site or opinion.

At 8:32 p.m., Anonymous Anonymous said...

You might also want to stop by and visit http://gravityc-idealism.blogspot.com to share comments as you may get the response you're looking for!

At 10:15 p.m., Blogger gravity control said...

It was a heartfelt, not a canned response.
You think I'd spend my time on this if it weren't?


Post a Comment

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker